i2c-imc-skylake: instantiate the SPD EEPROMs at probe
Call i2c_register_spd() per adapter, like i801 and piix4, instead of
telling the user to echo into new_device. The helper counts populated
slots from DMI and probes upwards from 0x50 via i2c_new_scanned_device(),
so it claims no address that does not answer; each channel carries half
the DIMMs and the scan is per adapter, so each finds its own. Verified:
four clients on load, two per channel, none on the empty slots, and
decode-dimms works with no manual step.
This needed Receive Byte to be worth doing — without I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE
ee1004 would not have bound to what was instantiated.
The write_disable variant is deliberate. This part is DDR4 only, where
the two are equivalent (the split gates spd5118 on DDR5), and of two
equivalent calls the one that does not read as "this driver enables SPD
writes" is the better name to leave in a driver whose bus is the memory
bus. In-tree convention is write_enable; the cover letter offers to
switch.
Kconfig gains select I2C_SMBUS.
Out-of-tree, compat.h maps the call onto the older unsplit
i2c_register_spd() where that is what the target kernel has. It is force
included from the Makefile so i2c-imc-skylake.c stays byte-identical to
the submitted file, and the Makefile detects the API by grepping the
target kernel's header rather than testing a version number, which keeps
it correct on backported trees. Builds clean against both 6.8 and 7.0
headers; DKMS 1.0.2 installs on all four kernels here.
test-smoke.sh needed two fixes to keep testing what it claims:
- A bound driver owns its address, so the raw transaction checks lost
the SPDs the moment the driver started instantiating them. The script
now unbinds ee1004 for the duration rather than deleting the clients:
sysfs delete_device only removes clients that new_device created,
and unbinding is sufficient because i2c-dev refuses an address only
while a driver is bound (i2cdev_check: `return dev->driver ? -EBUSY
: 0`). Rebound from an EXIT trap.
- Those checks were guarded on an SPD address having been found, and
when the lookup failed they vanished from the run silently: the suite
reported "12 passed, 0 failed" while seven checks had not executed.
Skipped checks are now counted and printed, which is how the above
was noticed at all.
Smoke suite: 20 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped. checkpatch --strict 0/0/0,
in-tree W=1 and Sparse clean.
This commit is contained in:
+74
-2
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ set -euo pipefail
|
||||
|
||||
PASS=0
|
||||
FAIL=0
|
||||
SKIP=0
|
||||
CH0=""
|
||||
CH1=""
|
||||
CH0_ADDR=""
|
||||
@@ -53,6 +54,16 @@ _fail()
|
||||
((FAIL++)) || true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# A check that could not run is not a check that passed. Several below are
|
||||
# guarded on an SPD address having been found, and when that lookup failed they
|
||||
# used to vanish from the run silently, leaving a shorter suite reporting
|
||||
# "0 failed" — which is how a regression hides.
|
||||
_skip()
|
||||
{
|
||||
echo "SKIP: $*"
|
||||
((SKIP++)) || true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_module_loaded()
|
||||
{
|
||||
lsmod | awk '$1 == "i2c_imc_skylake" { found = 1 } END { exit !found }'
|
||||
@@ -200,6 +211,43 @@ _load_unsafe()
|
||||
"${SUDO[@]}" insmod "$MODULE_PATH" allow_unsafe_access=1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# The driver instantiates ee1004 on the populated SPD addresses at probe, and
|
||||
# the checks below need those addresses raw. Unbind rather than delete: the
|
||||
# sysfs delete_device only removes clients that sysfs new_device created, while
|
||||
# i2c_register_spd() uses i2c_new_scanned_device(). Unbinding is enough anyway,
|
||||
# because i2c-dev refuses an address only while a driver is *bound* to it
|
||||
# (i2cdev_check: `return dev->driver ? -EBUSY : 0`).
|
||||
SPD_UNBOUND=()
|
||||
|
||||
_unbind_spd_clients()
|
||||
{
|
||||
local dev name
|
||||
|
||||
for dev in /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/ee1004/*-*; do
|
||||
[[ -e "$dev" ]] || continue
|
||||
name=${dev##*/}
|
||||
[[ "$name" == "$CH0-"* || "$name" == "$CH1-"* ]] || continue
|
||||
if printf '%s\n' "$name" |
|
||||
"${SUDO[@]}" tee /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/ee1004/unbind >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
||||
SPD_UNBOUND+=("$name")
|
||||
fi
|
||||
done
|
||||
echo "unbound ${#SPD_UNBOUND[@]} SPD client(s) for the raw transaction checks"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Put them back if the run ends early. On a clean run the reload cycles below
|
||||
# have already recreated and rebound them, so these writes just fail harmlessly.
|
||||
_rebind_spd_clients()
|
||||
{
|
||||
local name
|
||||
|
||||
for name in ${SPD_UNBOUND[@]+"${SPD_UNBOUND[@]}"}; do
|
||||
printf '%s\n' "$name" |
|
||||
"${SUDO[@]}" tee /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/ee1004/bind >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
|
||||
done
|
||||
}
|
||||
trap _rebind_spd_clients EXIT
|
||||
|
||||
DMESG_START=$("${SUDO[@]}" dmesg | wc -l)
|
||||
"${SUDO[@]}" modprobe i2c-dev
|
||||
_module_loaded && "${SUDO[@]}" rmmod i2c-imc-skylake
|
||||
@@ -210,6 +258,15 @@ _refresh_buses
|
||||
[[ -n "$CH0" ]] && _ok "ch0 adapter at i2c-$CH0" || _fail "ch0 adapter not found"
|
||||
[[ -n "$CH1" ]] && _ok "ch1 adapter at i2c-$CH1" || _fail "ch1 adapter not found"
|
||||
|
||||
# The driver instantiates SPD clients at probe. Prove it did, then take the
|
||||
# addresses back so the raw transaction checks can use them.
|
||||
_spd_clients=$(ls -d /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/ee1004/"$CH0"-00* \
|
||||
/sys/bus/i2c/drivers/ee1004/"$CH1"-00* 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
|
||||
((_spd_clients > 0)) &&
|
||||
_ok "driver instantiated $_spd_clients SPD EEPROM(s) at probe" ||
|
||||
_fail "no SPD EEPROM instantiated at probe"
|
||||
_unbind_spd_clients
|
||||
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH0" ]]; then
|
||||
_scan_spd "$CH0" CH0_ADDR && _ok "SPD device present on ch0" || _fail "no SPD device on ch0"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
@@ -220,30 +277,41 @@ fi
|
||||
echo "=== transfer semantics ==="
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH0_ADDR" ]]; then
|
||||
_word_test "$CH0" "$CH0_ADDR" && _ok "WORD_DATA byte order on ch0" || _fail "WORD_DATA test on ch0"
|
||||
else
|
||||
_skip "WORD_DATA on ch0: no reachable SPD address"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH1_ADDR" ]]; then
|
||||
_word_test "$CH1" "$CH1_ADDR" && _ok "WORD_DATA byte order on ch1" || _fail "WORD_DATA test on ch1"
|
||||
|
||||
else
|
||||
_skip "WORD_DATA on ch1: no reachable SPD address"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH0_ADDR" ]]; then
|
||||
_receive_byte_test "$CH0" "$CH0_ADDR" &&
|
||||
_ok "Receive Byte follows the EEPROM pointer on ch0" ||
|
||||
_fail "Receive Byte test on ch0"
|
||||
else
|
||||
_skip "Receive Byte follows the EEPROM pointer on ch0: no reachable SPD address"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH1_ADDR" ]]; then
|
||||
_receive_byte_test "$CH1" "$CH1_ADDR" &&
|
||||
_ok "Receive Byte follows the EEPROM pointer on ch1" ||
|
||||
_fail "Receive Byte test on ch1"
|
||||
else
|
||||
_skip "Receive Byte follows the EEPROM pointer on ch1: no reachable SPD address"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH0_ADDR" ]]; then
|
||||
_send_byte_test "$CH0" "$CH0_ADDR" &&
|
||||
_ok "Send Byte selects the SPD page on ch0" ||
|
||||
_fail "Send Byte test on ch0"
|
||||
else
|
||||
_skip "Send Byte selects the SPD page on ch0: no reachable SPD address"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH1_ADDR" ]]; then
|
||||
_send_byte_test "$CH1" "$CH1_ADDR" &&
|
||||
_ok "Send Byte selects the SPD page on ch1" ||
|
||||
_fail "Send Byte test on ch1"
|
||||
else
|
||||
_skip "Send Byte selects the SPD page on ch1: no reachable SPD address"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ -n "$CH0" ]]; then
|
||||
_nack_test "$CH0" && _ok "absent-device ENXIO on ch0" || _fail "expected ENXIO at address 0x77 on ch0"
|
||||
@@ -325,5 +393,9 @@ else
|
||||
_ok "every command reached the register"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
echo "=== result: $PASS passed, $FAIL failed ==="
|
||||
if ((SKIP)); then
|
||||
echo "=== result: $PASS passed, $FAIL failed, $SKIP skipped ==="
|
||||
else
|
||||
echo "=== result: $PASS passed, $FAIL failed ==="
|
||||
fi
|
||||
((FAIL == 0))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user