feat(workflow): rinomina build-nsis.yml -> build-nsInnoUnp.yml, aggiunge job release

- Rinominato gitea/workflows/build-nsis.yml in build-nsInnoUnp.yml
- Aggiunto job release: scarica artifact Windows+Linux, crea release Gitea
  via API REST, comprime e uploada gli asset come zip (richiede secret GITEA_TOKEN)
- Aggiornati tutti i riferimenti in README.md, TODO.md, plans/*.md
This commit is contained in:
Simone
2026-05-12 23:37:00 +02:00
parent 075d1c5dcf
commit 5d1b47e943
9 changed files with 135 additions and 71 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Cross-Review: GPT-5.5 Analysis of Local-CI-CD-System
# Cross-Review: GPT-5.5 Analysis of Local-CI-CD-System
Reviewer: Claude Opus 4.7, acting as lead architect.
Subject under review: [plans/gpt55-analysis.md](gpt55-analysis.md).
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The YAML structure issue is real. In [gitea/actions/local-ci-build/action.yml](.
However, GPT-5.5 escalates this to "VM build can succeed but `actions/upload-artifact` may receive empty `steps.invoke-ci.outputs.artifact-path` or `artifact-name`, causing workflow failure or missing artifacts." That part is wrong. The upload-artifact step explicitly reads `steps.invoke-ci.outputs.artifact-name` and `steps.invoke-ci.outputs.artifact-path`, which are **step-level outputs** set unconditionally in the inner PowerShell block by `"artifact-path=$artifactPath" | Out-File -FilePath $env:GITHUB_OUTPUT -Append -Encoding utf8`. Step-level outputs do not depend on the action having a top-level `outputs:` block. The upload works today.
What the missing `outputs:` block actually breaks is the **caller-facing** action interface: a downstream workflow cannot read `steps.local-ci-build.outputs.artifact-path` from outside this composite action. Since the only consumer today is [gitea/workflows/build-nsis.yml](../gitea/workflows/build-nsis.yml), which does not consume action outputs (artifact upload happens inside the composite step), the user-visible impact is zero today.
What the missing `outputs:` block actually breaks is the **caller-facing** action interface: a downstream workflow cannot read `steps.local-ci-build.outputs.artifact-path` from outside this composite action. Since the only consumer today is [gitea/workflows/build-nsInnoUnp.yml](../gitea/workflows/build-nsInnoUnp.yml), which does not consume action outputs (artifact upload happens inside the composite step), the user-visible impact is zero today.
Correct severity: **HIGH** (latent breakage waiting for a second consumer), not **CRITICAL**. The fix is still trivial — sub-30 minutes — so this distinction does not change the quick-wins list. But the framing matters for trust in the report's prioritisation.
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Out of 18 verifiable factual claims I cross-checked, 16 are correct, 1 is partia
What GPT-5.5 missed that my own analysis caught:
1. **`act_runner` service-account vs SSH alias mismatch** (my §8.2 HIGH). If [Setup-Host.ps1](../Setup-Host.ps1) installs `act_runner` as a Windows service running under `SYSTEM`, the `~/.ssh/config` alias `gitea-ci` referenced in [gitea/workflows/build-nsis.yml](../gitea/workflows/build-nsis.yml) (`repo-url: 'ssh://gitea-ci/Simone/...'`) lives in the *interactive user's* `~/.ssh/config`, not `SYSTEM`'s. This is a runtime-reachable bug: every Linux Mode 2 clone fails with "unknown host gitea-ci" until the alias is reinstalled in `C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\.ssh\config`. GPT-5.5 never mentions this. It is potentially HIGH-severity and definitely worth a verification step.
1. **`act_runner` service-account vs SSH alias mismatch** (my §8.2 HIGH). If [Setup-Host.ps1](../Setup-Host.ps1) installs `act_runner` as a Windows service running under `SYSTEM`, the `~/.ssh/config` alias `gitea-ci` referenced in [gitea/workflows/build-nsInnoUnp.yml](../gitea/workflows/build-nsInnoUnp.yml) (`repo-url: 'ssh://gitea-ci/Simone/...'`) lives in the *interactive user's* `~/.ssh/config`, not `SYSTEM`'s. This is a runtime-reachable bug: every Linux Mode 2 clone fails with "unknown host gitea-ci" until the alias is reinstalled in `C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\.ssh\config`. GPT-5.5 never mentions this. It is potentially HIGH-severity and definitely worth a verification step.
2. **`Measure-CIBenchmark.ps1` uses `getGuestIPAddress` instead of `guestVar ci-ip`** (my §3.3, §11.3). GPT-5.5 mentions this almost as a footnote ("It still uses `getGuestIPAddress` rather than the newer `guestinfo.ci-ip` path"), but does not connect it to the larger issue: the benchmark measures a different IP-discovery path than production, so benchmark results do not represent real timing. This makes capacity-planning data unreliable.